According to reports, the former president shook hands all around and signed books for several of his 168 fellow jurors. “This looks like Chicago!” he told them. Sonal Joshi, a court clerk, told reporters, “He’s gorgeous!”
Maybe it was the red JUROR sticker Obama put on his lapel.
Former President George W. Bush reported for jury duty in Dallas in 2015, and former President Bill Clinton was called to serve in New York in 2003. They were quickly dismissed, too, but made the point that they were ready to do their civic duty.
Cook County Chief Judge Timothy Evans said, “If the former president of the United States takes his time to come, anybody ought to be willing to come.”
Any attorney or judge would have qualms about putting a former president on a jury — especially in his hometown, where he won 84 percent of the vote and schools are named for him. It might make what’s supposed to be a jury of 12 citizens into “a jury of one,” as Scott Turow, the novelist, and lawyer, told us.
“No other juror would want to contradict a former president,” he said.
Imagine a former president telling a fellow juror with whom he disagreed, “Oh yeah? And how many electoral votes did you win?”
“The obverse concern,” says Turow, “is that one or two jurors would disagree with the president just because they disagreed with him on other matters, increasing the possibility of deadlock.”
But in just showing up for jury duty, former presidents say something vital about the political system in which they were briefly privileged to occupy the highest rung. Presidents have extra responsibilities, many of which most of us can’t imagine. But they have no special privileges. They are elected to uphold the law, not be above it. As Justice Felix Frankfurter said, “In a democracy, the highest office is the office of citizen.”
November 11, 2017
8:00 AM ET